| Brand Name: | Sinopack |
| Model Number: | PRM-FIBC-800-cGMP |
| MOQ: | 100 Pieces |
| Price: | USD 12.00-35.00 / Piece |
| Delivery Time: | 15-25 working days after order confirmation |
| Payment Terms: | T/T, L/C at sight |
Pharmaceutical packaging is regulated as a critical component of the drug product quality system under 21 CFR Part 211 (cGMP for Finished Pharmaceuticals) and ICH Q7 (GMP for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients). For API manufacturers shipping intermediates in FIBCs, the packaging material is a potential source of contamination through extractables (compounds that can be extracted from the packaging under aggressive laboratory conditions) and leachables (compounds that actually migrate into the product under real-use conditions).
Regulatory agencies increasingly scrutinize packaging for API starting materials: the FDA issued 14 Warning Letters in 2023-2024 citing inadequate packaging qualification for API intermediates, and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) now requires an extractables and leachables (E&L) risk assessment in the Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) Module 3.2.S.6 (Container Closure System) for all new drug applications — even for APIs where the packaging was previously considered low-risk. The consequence of inadequate E&L data during a regulatory inspection is severe: rejection of the drug master file (DMF), clinical hold on Investigational New Drug (IND) applications, or import alert for commercial product.
Commercial PE resins contain a complex mixture of additives required for manufacturing and performance: primary antioxidants (hindered phenols like Irganox 1010, typically 300-1000 ppm), secondary antioxidants (phosphites like Irgafos 168, 500-1500 ppm), acid scavengers (metal stearates like calcium stearate, 500-1000 ppm), slip agents (erucamide, 500-1000 ppm), anti-block agents (silica, 1000-3000 ppm), and processing aids (fluoroelastomers, 200-500 ppm). Additionally, PE resin contains oligomers — low molecular weight polymer chains (C20-C60, MW 280-840 Da) that are inherent to the polymerization process and constitute 0.5-2.0% of the resin weight.
Each of these compounds is a potential leachable. The migration risk depends on: compound molecular weight (MW <1000 Da have higher diffusion coefficients and migration potential), octanol-water partition coefficient (log P, higher values indicate greater affinity for lipophilic API environments), and concentration in the polymer (driving force for Fickian diffusion). A formal extractables study per USP <1663> typically identifies 20-50 individual chemical species in a PE liner extract, with 5-15 requiring toxicological safety assessment per ICH M7 and PQRI PODP guidelines.
Our PRM-FIBC-800-cGMP liner is manufactured from pharmaceutical-grade LDPE resin specifically formulated for minimized extractables. The additive package is simplified compared to commercial PE: only primary antioxidant (Irganox 1010 at 300 ppm, the minimum effective concentration for processing stability), acid scavenger (zinc stearate at 400 ppm, preferred over calcium stearate for lower extractable metal content), and no slip agents (processing adjusted to compensate), no anti-block (replaced by controlled surface roughness from extrusion die design), and no fluoroeleastomer processing aids.
The liner is manufactured in an ISO Class 7 cleanroom with HEPA-filtered positive-pressure air, temperature/humidity control, and full operator gowning (hair cover, beard cover, cleanroom suit, shoe covers, gloves). Environmental monitoring includes: airborne particulate counts (≥0.5μm and ≥5.0μm, measured at 6 locations per shift), settle plates for viable microorganisms (<50 CFU/4-hour exposure), surface swabs for bioburden (<10 CFU/100cm²), and personnel monitoring (finger dab plates after gowning, <5 CFU/5 fingers).
We provide a comprehensive extractables data package: controlled extraction study per USP <1663> (50% ethanol, 72 hours at 50°C — aggressive conditions exceeding real use), extractables identification by GC-MS and LC-MS, toxicological safety assessment per ICH M7 (for mutagenic impurities) and PQRI PODP (for non-mutagenic extractables), and a Leachables Risk Assessment specific to the customer's API (based on API solubility parameters, storage temperature, and contact duration). For customers filing DMFs, we provide a Letter of Authorization (LOA) to reference our Type III DMF in their application.
Chinese API manufacturers shipping intermediates to US FDA-registered and EU GMP-certified formulation facilities require packaging documentation that satisfies regulatory inspection. Our DMF-supported bags provide the regulatory documentation infrastructure without the need for the API manufacturer to conduct independent E&L studies.
CMOs producing intermediates for multiple pharmaceutical customers require packaging that is universally acceptable across different customer quality agreements. Our cGMP-compliant bags with standardized extractables documentation simplify the supplier qualification process for CMOs with diverse customer requirements.
| Regulatory Context | Required Documentation | Recommended Bag |
|---|---|---|
| Non-regulated (industrial chemicals) | Basic CoA | Standard FIBC |
| GMP Starting Materials (ICH Q7, Section 7) | CoA + Change Control | cGMP-compliant + change notification |
| API Intermediate for US/EU Market | CoA + Extractables + DMF Support | Full pharma-grade with DMF LOA |
| Sterile API (Aseptic Processing) | All above + Endotoxin + Bioburden | Pharma-grade + sterility assurance package |
A Type III Drug Master File is a submission to the US FDA containing information on packaging materials. It allows the packaging manufacturer to confidentially submit proprietary information (formulation, manufacturing process, extractables data) directly to the FDA, while the API or drug product manufacturer references this DMF in their application without having access to the confidential details. For FIBC liners used in API packaging, a Type III DMF demonstrates that the packaging supplier has undergone FDA scrutiny and that the FDA has not objected to the filed information. While not strictly required, having a DMF significantly streamlines regulatory review because the FDA reviewer can cross-reference existing information rather than requesting new studies. We hold a Type III DMF for our pharmaceutical-grade liner and provide a Letter of Authorization (LOA) to customers to reference it. DMFs are reviewed during the drug application review process (NDA, ANDA, DMF review) and typically take 60-90 days from submission to first review cycle.
Change control follows the ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System framework. Any proposed change to the liner material, manufacturing process, or facility that could affect product quality undergoes a formal change control process: (1) Change proposal with risk assessment (using FMEA methodology), (2) Technical review by our quality unit, (3) Regulatory assessment (determining if the change requires customer or regulatory notification), (4) Implementation with verification testing, and (5) Closure with effectiveness check. For changes classified as "moderate" or "major" (ICH Q7, Section 13), we provide a minimum 90-day advance notification to customers to allow time for their own change assessment and regulatory reporting. We maintain a change control log that is available for customer audit.
For standard pharmaceutical-grade liners (non-sterile API packaging), we guarantee: Endotoxin <0.25 EU/mL (LAL kinetic chromogenic method per USP <85>) on liner rinse water — this is the WFI (Water for Injection) specification and is suitable for APIs used in parenteral drug products. Bioburden <10 CFU/100cm² (TAMC, USP <61>) on liner interior surface — suitable for non-sterile API packaging. For sterile API packaging (requiring sterility assurance), FIBC liners present significant sterilization challenges (PE cannot withstand autoclave temperatures, gamma irradiation can degrade PE properties, and EtO sterilization leaves residual gas concerns). For sterile applications, we recommend rigid stainless steel or glass containers with validated sterilization rather than FIBCs.