logo
Good price online

products details

Created with Pixso. Home Created with Pixso. Products Created with Pixso.
UN Big Bag
Created with Pixso. Industry-Grade UN Packaging Bags 2000kg Bulk Capacity Corrosive Chemical Solids 13H3/Y Certified Woven PP

Industry-Grade UN Packaging Bags 2000kg Bulk Capacity Corrosive Chemical Solids 13H3/Y Certified Woven PP

Brand Name: Sinopack
Model Number: UN-PKG-2000-CR
MOQ: 100 Pieces
Price: USD 10.00-28.00 / Piece
Delivery Time: 10-18 working days after order confirmation
Payment Terms: T/T, L/C at sight, D/P
Detail Information
Place of Origin:
Shandong, China
Certification:
UN 13H3/Y, ISO 21898:2019, ISO 9001:2015, REACH Compliant
UN Certification Marking:
13H3/Y/MM/YY/CN/Sinopack-XXXX
Fabric Weight Range:
180-260 G/m² Virgin PP
Inner Liner Thickness:
80-150 μm LDPE/LLDPE Blend
Chemical Resistance:
PH Range 2-12 Compatible
Top Construction:
Open Top With Tie Closure / Duffle Top
Bottom Construction:
Flat Bottom / Discharge Spout (40-50cm)
Lifting Loop Type:
Cross Corner / U-Panel / Stevedore Strap
UV Stabilization:
0.5% HALS UV Package (ASTM G154 800+ Hours)
Packaging Details:
Shrink-wrapped on heat-treated pallets, corner board protection, 35 bags per pallet
Supply Ability:
180000 Pieces per Month
Highlight:

UN Packaging Bags Bulk

,

Corrosive Chemical FIBC

,

13H3/Y Certified Packaging

Product Description

1. Problem: Chemical Attack — When Packaging Becomes Part of the Reaction

Corrosive solids — including sodium hydroxide pellets (UN 1823), calcium hypochlorite (UN 2880), and ferric chloride anhydrous (UN 1773) — present a unique challenge: the packaging itself becomes a reactant. A 2023 study by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) documented 47 packaging failure incidents in EU-bound chemical shipments over a 12-month period, with 62% attributed to inadequate chemical compatibility between the product and the inner liner material.

The failure mode follows a predictable degradation cascade: the PE liner absorbs trace moisture from the chemical product, creating a localized high-concentration micro-environment at the liner-product interface. This accelerates Environmental Stress Cracking (ESC) — the phenomenon where polyethylene in contact with polar chemicals develops microfractures under tensile stress. ASTM D1693 testing shows that standard LDPE liners (MFR 2.0, density 0.920 g/cm³) exposed to 10% NaOH solution at 50°C develop ESC failure in as little as 48 hours compared to 1,000+ hours for chemically optimized LLDPE/LDPE blends.

2. Cause: The Molecular Mechanism of Liner Degradation

ESC operates through a chemo-mechanical coupling mechanism. Polar chemical agents — particularly strong bases (NaOH, KOH) and oxidizing agents (hypochlorites, peroxides) — diffuse into the amorphous regions of semi-crystalline polyethylene. The diffusion coefficient for NaOH in LDPE at 40°C is approximately 2.3 * 10⁻⁸ cm²/s, meaning a 100μm liner reaches 50% saturation within 12 hours of continuous contact.

Once absorbed, the chemical agent plasticizes the tie molecules connecting adjacent crystalline lamellae. The resulting reduction in entanglement density lowers the material's critical stress intensity factor (K_IC) from 1.5 MPa·m^(1/2) (unexposed LDPE) to below 0.4 MPa·m^(1/2) (NaOH-saturated). At this point, the residual hoop stress from FIBC filling (typically 0.3-0.8 MPa in the liner) exceeds the degraded fracture toughness, propagating micro-cracks that ultimately breach containment.

A secondary failure pathway involves the PP outer fabric: certain chemicals (particularly strong oxidizing agents at elevated temperatures >45°C) can attack PP's tertiary carbon backbone through a free-radical chain scission mechanism. This reduces the fabric's molecular weight from an initial M_w of 250,000-300,000 g/mol to below 80,000 g/mol, corresponding to a 55-65% loss in tensile strength.

3. Solution: Multi-Layer Chemical Barrier Engineering

We implement a three-tier chemical defense architecture. The primary barrier employs an LLDPE/LDPE coextruded liner (70% LLDPE butene copolymer, 30% LDPE) with enhanced ESC resistance verified by ASTM D1693 Condition B (100% Igepal CO-630, 50°C) — achieving >500 hours to 50% failure, compared to 48 hours for standard LDPE. The LLDPE fraction's higher comonomer content increases tie molecule density by approximately 40%, directly improving crack propagation resistance.

For aggressive oxidizer applications (pH < 2 or pH > 12), we offer an EVOH barrier layer coextrusion: a 5-layer structure of PE/tie/EVOH/tie/PE that reduces oxygen transmission rate (OTR) to <0.5 cc/m²/24h (23°C, 0% RH) and provides exceptional chemical resistance through the EVOH layer's high crystallinity (35-40%) and strong interchain hydrogen bonding.

The outer PP fabric incorporates a chemically resistant stabilization package: 0.3% HALS (Hindered Amine Light Stabilizer, Chimassorb 944 equivalent), 0.2% phenolic antioxidant (Irganox 1010 equivalent), and 0.1% phosphite processing stabilizer (Irgafos 168 equivalent). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) confirms <2% weight loss after 500 hours at 80°C in oxidative atmosphere.

4. Application: Chemical Class-Specific Solutions

4.1 Strong Base Solids (NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)₂)

Require ESC-resistant LLDPE/LDPE liner (minimum 120μm) with carbon black pigmentation (2% w/w) to provide additional UV and chemical barrier. Recommended storage temperature below 40°C to minimize diffusion-driven degradation rates (Arrhenius activation energy for NaOH in PE: 45 kJ/mol).

4.2 Oxidizing Agent Powders (NaClO₂, Ca(ClO)₂, KMnO₄)

Demand the EVOH barrier liner to prevent oxidative degradation of the PP outer fabric through oxygen permeation. The EVOH layer reduces oxygen ingress by 40* compared to a monolayer PE liner. Bags should be stored away from reducing agents and organic materials per UN segregation guidelines.

4.3 Acidic Salt Hydrates (FeCl₃·6H₂O, AlCl₃·6H₂O)

These deliquescent salts create localized acidic microenvironments (pH 1-3) upon moisture absorption. Our HDPE-rich inner layer (40% HDPE, 60% LLDPE) provides superior acid resistance due to HDPE's higher crystallinity (55-65% vs 35-45% for LDPE), reducing the amorphous fraction available for acid permeation.

5. How to Choose: UN Packaging Bag Configuration Matrix

Chemical CategorypH RangeRecommended LinerMin. ThicknessMax. Temp
Neutral salts5-9Standard LDPE80 μm60°C
Weak acids/bases3-5 / 9-11LLDPE/LDPE Blend100 μm50°C
Strong bases11-14ESC-Resistant LLDPE/LDPE120 μm40°C
Strong oxidizersN/AEVOH 5-Layer Coextrusion120 μm35°C
Deliquescent acids1-3HDPE/LLDPE Blend150 μm45°C

6. FAQ

Q1: How do you test chemical compatibility for a new product formulation?

We offer a free compatibility testing program: customers send 500g of product sample, and we perform a 14-day accelerated immersion test at 50°C with periodic tensile strength sampling of both liner and fabric. The test report includes: tensile retention percentage at Day 3, 7, and 14; ESC crack density via SEM microscopy; melt flow index change of the PP fabric (indicating chain scission); and FTIR spectroscopy to detect chemical species migration. Full report delivered within 3 weeks with a compatibility rating and recommended liner specification.

Q2: What is the difference between food-grade and chemical-grade inner liners?

Food-grade liners comply with FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 (olefin polymers) and EU 10/2011 for food contact, using virgin resins with restricted additive packages and overall migration limits below 10 mg/dm². Chemical-grade liners focus on ESC resistance and chemical inertness rather than food contact safety, allowing a broader range of performance-enhancing additives (processing aids, antioxidant packages, slip agents) that may not be food-contact approved. The two are not interchangeable: chemical-grade liners may leach additives unacceptable for food, while food-grade liners lack the chemical resistance needed for corrosive products.

Q3: Can UN packaging bags be customized for automated filling lines?

Yes. We engineer custom configurations for automated FFS (Form-Fill-Seal) and FIBC filling stations: reinforced lifting loops with RFID tags for automated crane pickup, laser-guide alignment markers for robotic spout positioning, frangible seam technology for controlled discharge at 80% fill, and Quick-Connect spout adapters compatible with standard pneumatic conveyor flanges (ISO 2852 clamp fittings). Lead time for custom automated line configurations is 4-6 weeks including compatibility testing at our in-house automation simulation lab.